Which of the following statements about hunting is true? There are misconceptions about hunting for centuries ago. Such concepts come from within the hunting professionals and the outsiders in hunting.
Some of these statements are so obvious that there has been a heated discussion on both electronic media and print media as well. But the question among these famous statements is which of the following statements about hunting are true.
Which Of The Following Statements About Hunting Is True?
The list of statements
The first statement is hunters hardly spend their resources and effort on ensuring that there is wildlife conservation in comparison to other stakeholders. Secondly, prolonged excessive hunting will lead to an edge effect.
The third statement is that hunting has proven to be effective wildlife conservation and management tool and lastly, forth, is that regulated hunting is the major reason for the extinction of many North American animals. These statements will be discussed in-depth as the question is settled.
Hunters hardly spend their resources.
Hunters just like any other shoppers are not spared from the taxes imposed on them. When they buy the hunting equipment different states have taxes that are passed on to the hunters.
The hunting areas have some fee charged on them to ensure that the hunting areas are developed more and the human capital are paid adequately. More so, when hunters get their licenses, they are required to pay some dollars.
Hunters’ personal contribution to hunting
To add salt to the injury, there are massive campaigns online among hunters who undertake various projects in areas where they hunt. This includes but is not limited to fencing the parks. In situations where there has been rogue hunting, the clubs held a protest for the rogue hunters to be gunned down.
Therefore this statement is false as it does not indicate the true position of the hunters’ contribution to the development of the hunting industry. However, not all hunters read from the same page. Some do not have valid licenses while some hardly get themselves involved in corporate social responsibilities. In fact, the hunter should be.
Prolonged massive hunting leads to edge effect
The edge effect refers to changes in population structure that affects two boundaries producing adverse effects. Massive hunting can be grossly misunderstood by many. In areas where the resources are so minimal in comparison to the animals, hunting could be recommended.
Such is seen during the extreme dry periods when the vegetation has dried up with the animals facing possible extinction. Sometimes, the animals could leave their territory and attack vegetation planted for domestic consumptions.
If the animals are too many with very few hunters automatically there will be prolonged hunting.
Hunting and its relationship to edge effect
Since hunting is controlled by several agencies, their decision on massive hunting or not is based on having considered several options. Once they have ensured that the number wanted has been achieved, they will order the ceasing of hunting.
Therefore this statement is not true. However, in areas where there is unregulated hunting which is very few, there is a likelihood of massive hunting leading to edge effect.
Hunting has proven as an effective management tool.
Regulated hunting will ensure that resources available for consummation are enough. For instance, if there are many deer in the forest, there is a likelihood of inadequate food which will lead to many of them starving, even unto death.
When the numbers of animals have increased tremendously, hunting will help reduce the numbers so that the resources will be enough. Other ways can be used to reduce the population such as using chemicals but they are not effective in hunting.
Why hunting stands out
Furthermore, hunting allows the agencies through funding to help protect not only the hunted animals but all the species. Population reductions at the required levels are clear shreds of evidence of hunters becoming part and parcel of the wildlife management.
The older animals which are weak are reduced drastically to leave room for young and energetic ones which will ensure that there is an assured generation for the future.
Therefore this statement is a true statement on hunting being an effective management tool.
Regulated hunting has led to the extinction of many North American animals.
Regulated hunting has been the bedrock of wildlife conservation in North America. The conservation history rose through a movement of hunters. The main aim was to reduce drastically overexploitation of wildlife by the gamers and ensure wildlife is accessible to everyone.
North American Model of Wildlife Conservation
In the 19th century, the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation was established by hunters. This movement created an unequaled abundance of native wildlife and established a professional club of wildlife biologists.
In the past decades when hunting was not regulated, its effects were seen even now. Many animals were hunted and their numbers reduced drastically to almost extinction. The few that have been left are now under tight security and the ban on hunting them has not been lifted years later.
Moreover, unregulated hunting may result in having one gender being hunted more than the other gender which will create an unbalanced network.
Therefore, such a statement can be labeled as false since it speaks exactly the opposite of what should be happening. Regulated hunting ensures that hunting is done at the right time, the right way, and through the right process. For instance, hunting is minimized during the period when animals are breed in.
Hunters have always been at the center of wildlife management. They have always been active in formulating the selfless policies which have ensured that priority is given to the hunted rather than the hunter.
Therefore the hunters need to be protected from the political, social, and economic pressure and noise form individuals who want to enjoy the short-term gains. The future roles of hunters will include mobilization from the unwilling hunters of many resources to ensure that they stand out.
This includes being able to shame out the hunters who are involved in illegal hunting more so in areas that are forbidden. This has settled down the question of minds on which of the following statement about hunting is true.